|
Two Kings
Contrasted 2 Samue1 1:1-15; John 6:1-21
Introduction
In the latest Harry Potter film, episode 6 of 7, Harry continues to grow
up and be prepared for his destiny. In one of the more light-hearted scenes
Hermione says to him that although she admires his courage and bravery,
sometimes he can be really thick. One of the things that makes Harry so
attractive to those of us who enjoy his story, is that he is in many ways
an ordinary young man. He is very human – a mixture of good and
not-so-good.
David, a
very human king
Are you embarrassed reading today’s story about David and Bathsheba?
Perhaps you know of the story but to have it read in church feels a little
like bringing a gossip magazine into a sacred place – it doesn’t
feel quite right, somehow. One of the things we tend to forget about the
Bible is that it doesn’t pull any punches about being human –
whether it is our bodily functions or the shameful ways in which we sometimes
treat each other. It is significant that the scandal of David committing
adultery and then trying to cover it up is preserved in all the stories
about him. Most histories of great kings or leaders would try to minimize
their failings. So why is this damaging story included in the book of
Samuel? Well, one possibility is that the writer has never been convinced
about God’s people being ruled by kings. He feels that God’s
people, Israel, should be ruled by God – should be a theocracy,
not a monarchy. The people demanded kings so that they could be like the
other nations around them. God gave in, but their kings were all as human
as the next man. David was a great king, a model king in many ways, but
he was also fallible, and this story is included to remind people who
read the books of Samuel, that David wasn’t the saint that you might
think he was.
Those who
rule us
The by-election this week in Norwich North has highlighted the ways in
which the tides of democracy can turn very quickly. Who rules us and what
they do with the power we give them is very much a part of our news. A
Conservative victory has been no surprise. The voters of Norwich turned
their backs on the Labour Party for a number of reasons, but one element
was a protest against the parliamentary expenses scandals that have hit
the headlines over the last few months. We have to run human society in
stable and peaceful ways, and, as Winston Churchill put it, ‘democracy
is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.’
In the best of democracies we are able to hold our leaders to account,
and it has been no bad thing for the misuse of power in the expenses scandals
to be exposed. As Christians we live in two realms – the earthly
and the heavenly. When Christians are persecuted, it is sometimes because
they have been misunderstood. It is thought by the persecutors that Christians
do not accept the human realm because of their belonging to the heavenly.
The opposite should be true: because we belong to the heavenly realm,
the values by which we live make us into good earthly citizens. We may
accept the right of earthly rulers to govern us, but we expect them to
rule in just and fair ways. We can do this because we can compare earthly
rulers with our heavenly ruler. Today’s Bible readings illustrate
this in clear ways. I would like to draw a few comparisons between King
David and King Jesus.
Leading God’s
people
We can look at the contrasts between David and Jesus because of their
similarities. We know from the gospel that Jesus was a descendent of David.
As the hymn-writer James Montgomery put it in Hail to the Lord’s
anointed: “Great David’s greater Son.” Both men led
God’s people in the footsteps of Moses. We saw two weeks ago how
David brought the Ark of the Covenant into Jerusalem. The ark had been
Moses’ symbol of God’s presence with his people and David
was keen to preserve that symbol. The way that John tells the story of
the feeding of the 5,000 is important. He mentions that the time was near
the Passover. John mentions this because the Passover was a special festival
for the Jewish people. It celebrated the time when Moses led the children
of Israel out to a desert-land and they had manna from heaven. John paints
a picture of Jesus being like Moses when he gives the crowds bread to
eat in a miraculous way. They had followed him out to a deserted place
where there was nothing to eat. Like the manna, everyone had more than
enough to eat.
Different
attitudes to sacrifice
Now we can look at some of the differences between David and Jesus. We
can see this in their different attitudes to sacrifice. David took Uriah’s
wife and when it was reported that she was pregnant, David tried to cover
it up by getting her husband to come back and sleep with her. If she had
a child it would look like it was Uriah’s. But Uriah didn’t
do what David hoped, preferring to keep faith with his comrades on the
battle field. So David arranged for Uriah to be killed in the battle field
and in this way sacrificed him in order to cover up his adultery.
In the feeding
of the 5,000 Jesus took the boys’ packed lunch and made it go round
far more than it was intended to feed! David took Bathsheba for his own
pleasure. Jesus took the boy’s 5 loaves and 2 fish and made sure
that it benefitted everyone. The first sacrifice was forced and ended
in death; the second sacrifice was freely given and gave life to all the
people.
Different
attitudes to power
A second difference lay in David and Jesus’ different attitudes
to power. Power over people is something that is either given or taken.
In a democracy, the ideal is that our rulers are put there by us to rule
all of us. David was given power to be king by his anointing and by the
people coming to him to invite him to take power. So far so good. Later
in life David took the power he was given but misused it for his own pleasure.
When the
crowd of 5,000 enjoyed being fed by a miracle, they decided that it would
be quite good to have a leader like Jesus. If they got him to be their
king, they would have free food for life! Jesus turned down the offer
of power to be an earthly king when it became clear that the people misunderstood
him. He wasn’t simply a new version of Moses. He had come, not to
be an earthly king, and give people physical food all the time. He had
come to show people what it meant to be in the kingdom of heaven. He had
come to lead people into a fresh relationship with God. They would still
be citizens of earth, and need to live ordinary, everyday lives: working
for a living and obeying whatever political power was in place. But they
could also lead fulfilling spiritual lives, knowing what it was to live
on earth by the values of heaven. So Jesus withdrew from the crowds and
went away on his own until it all died down.
In the thick
of it
A third difference lay in David and Jesus’ attitude to the people
they led. David had stopped going out to be with his soldiers when they
had to face the enemy. He had grown lazy and selfish staying behind at
home. Instead David put Uriah in the thick of the battle in order to get
him killed.
Jesus fed
the 5000 who were surrounding him. They had followed him out to a deserted
place and had listened to his teaching and the sick had been healed. Now
they were hungry and Jesus had compassion on their physical needs. In
some ways he was responsible for them all being there, and responded to
the need that was surrounding him. Later Jesus came to the disciples in
the middle of the storm and brought them peace. At the right times Jesus
was found in the thick of things. At the right times he withdrew to be
on his own.
Conclusion
A half-blood in the Harry Potter stories, is someone who has both wizarding
and muggle blood in them: someone who belongs to both worlds. Just as
Harry discovers his true nature and calling, we can grow in discovering
what it means to be citizens of earthly and heavenly kingdoms and fulfil
whatever our calling might be.
Copyright
© Rev Paul Smith
|