| |
|
|
|
It’s
Not Fair! Philippians 1.21–30 Matthew 20.1–16
Introduction
Supermarket and airport check-in queues are the worst! The first to arrive
can easily end up the last to be served, as you have to guess which is
the fastest-moving queue and join it, only to see your neighbour gliding
past whilst your are stuck behind someone who has to pay for extra baggage
or has the wrong identity papers. The temptation to join the faster queue
is very strong, but is always a risk – perhaps the same thing will
happen to you again! And if someone dares to queue jump – well that
is just the ultimate frustration, especially if you are British!
Labourers
in the Vineyard
Jesus told a parable that challenged our sense of fairness. A landowner
needed labour in his vineyard. Perhaps it was the harvest as he plainly
needed as much labour as he could get. In those days, as perhaps in agrarian
cultures today, the place to get or find work was the market-place or
main square. The landowner kept returning to see if more labourers had
arrived later in the day, and finding them at regular intervals employed
them, agreeing a fair wage. Even when there was only an hour to go before
sundown, he found some to help finish the day’s work. These last
got their pay first and perhaps they were pleasantly surprised to be given
a whole day’s wage. Imagine the anticipation in the minds of those
who were further back in the queue and had worked much more of the day.
If the boss is being so generous, then we’re bound to get even more
than what was agreed! Imagine their feelings when they all get exactly
the same. You’ve guessed it – they grumble. If there were
a tribunal, they would be going straight there! Of course, they wouldn’t
complain about how little they got in comparison to the late comers, that
wouldn’t look good. Oh, no! They would say that this landowner would
create unrest throughout the whole market-place with his unpredictable
wage-policy. It would create ill-feeling and unrest amongst the work-force.
He should be brought into line and comply with normal practice lest the
whole labour-relations structure come tumbling down!
Challenge to Assumptions
Of course Jesus’ parable causes upset and reaction! His parables
are meant to provoke and challenge, but they do so with good reason. Why
was Jesus telling this parable in the first place? It was in response
to the ongoing dialogue between Jesus and his disciples, principally through
Peter. Peter had exclaimed that he and the other disciples had left everything
to follow Jesus. What would their reward be? That in itself was a response
to the rich young man who had turned away unable to give up his wealth
in order to follow Jesus. The disciples were astounded at such a thing,
having assumed that it would be good to have a rich person join the cause.
Surely rich people were a sign of God’s approval? Jesus teaches
his followers that their assumed values are the opposite to those of the
Kingdom of Heaven. Those considered first by worldly standards will be
last and vice versa. It is harder for a rich person to enter the Kingdom
of Heaven than for a camel to squeeze through the eye of a needle!
Early Church
Concerns
We can look at some of the ways in which the challenge of this parable
can be applied to our society, but the next thing to ask is why Matthew
included this parable in his gospel? It helps to recall the background
to the writing of this gospel. Matthew was concerned about the unity of
the Church. His community of believers drew strongly from both Jewish
and Gentile backgrounds. The young Church was fragile and although all
rejoiced to worship and follow Christ, they came from very different cultural
backgrounds. Matthew tells his story of Jesus in such a way as to try
and draw those of both sides together. He emphasises the importance of
Jewish scriptures and how Jesus had not come to rubbish all they held
dear. On the other hand he emphasises that Gentiles can come to Christ
with a genuine and real faith. In the parable of the labourers in the
vineyard we see how those who came late in the day are given the same
gracious treatment as those who had been there all along. Perhaps Matthew
wanted to challenge a grudging attitude amongst Jewish believers that
they felt hard done-by when Gentile believers came swanning in shortly
before the second coming, without having had to shoulder the burden of
the Laws of Moses. There was perhaps, an underlying assumption that Gentiles
didn’t deserve such free grace from God. Matthew reminds them all
of a parable Jesus told that seemed to address these attitudes.
How do we
interpret this parable for today?
If that is one way in which the parable could have been interpreted then,
what about nowadays? As with the two interpretations we’ve already
considered, we start with those things which concern us. What are the
issues with which our society is concerned now? Let me suggest two: the
banking and sovereign debt crisis in the EU and the movement for a living
wage.
Economy
Very much in the news at the moment is the economic situation of the world,
mainly driven by the debt crisis in the Euro-zone. Greece needs to borrow
billions in order to stay solvent. German citizens, meanwhile, can understandably
resent that fact that it is their money which is being swallowed up to
pay for the debt. It is probably more complex than that, but that is how
I understand it as a non-economist! I was interested to hear further discussion
of this, though, because there is more interdependency between the nations
of the EU than this scenario presents. Germany exports more to the rest
of the EU than to other parts of the world. Having the same currency makes
a big difference. If the EU were split into better off and worse off halves,
the market for German goods might not be as profitable. Again, I stress
that I am not an economist and I’m sure others will be much better
informed. But a theologian has pointed out something we may miss in the
parable of the labourers in the vineyard. When the all-day labourers complained
about the generosity of the landowner towards the one-hour workers, perhaps
they forgot how relieved they might have been to get fresh muscle in when
they were feeling weary at the end of the day. Perhaps they forgot how
the afternoon workers brought fresh drink and snacks with them which they
shared. Most of all, they forgot they had agreed a fair day’s wage
with the landowner when they agreed to go and work in the morning. A banking
crisis occurs when trust is lost. Those with capital, as I understand
it, are unwilling to risk lending it, and then the whole system of lending
and borrowing collapses. Kingdom values are about interdependence. Perhaps
a good economy is one which values and promotes a true sense of interdependence
between all those who participate in it: lenders and borrowers; workers
and employers; the more able, experienced and hard working, and those
not so fortunate.
Living Wage
The second concern is one that may not be in the headlines, but is a real
one: the movement for a living wage. A living wage is not the same as
the minimum wage. The concept of a living wage is that which is enough
to sustain someone’s family or household. Citizens:MK has adopted
this as one of its current projects. Tesco’s has been a focus for
the campaign to persuade them to pay their workers a wage that is nearer
to sustenance level than the legal minimum. The parable of the labourers
in the vineyard emphasises that the landowner agreed a fair wage. The
all-day workers accepted this in the morning, but resented the evening
employees getting the same. But they, too, needed a wage that was fair,
a wage that was not just in return for work, but which would sustain their
households. The grumbling employees forgot that they were all dependent
on a fair employer, regardless of the number of hours they might have
worked. We are so much influenced by “the language of justice and
rights” (as the Chief Rabbi, Jonathan Sachs puts it) that we forget
the values of covenant and forgiveness which lie at the heart of our faith.
Conclusion
Are these interpretations of the parable too political? Maybe, but if
we remember that God cares about the whole of human life, including the
way in which we treat each other in society, we might see how Jesus’
parables apply. Spiritually the message is clear: we all depend on the
generosity of God. Whether we have worked hard at keeping our religion
for years or have just come to faith, God is gracious and saves all of
us with equal mercy & love!
Copyright
© Rev Paul Smith
|
|
|
|
|