| |
|
|
|
FIRE FROM
HEAVEN Luke 9:51-62
Introduction
The question of enemies and friends, allies and opponents is never far
from current human affairs. Those of us who stand outside conflicts between
different peoples find it hard to understand such differences. Locked
in the cage that is Gaza, Palestinians of the Fatah and Hamas factions
seem intent on mutual destruction when they desparately need to stand
together for survival. Closer to home, there seems to have been plenty
of controversy when Gordon Brown attempted to recruit people of a different
party into his team. Was it genuine openness to the contributions of non-Labour
party members, or was it the cynical move of a cunning politician? Time
may tell in the long run!
Face towards
Jerusalem
Enmity between the different peoples or groups in the Bible is something
we may find difficult to understand. We have to work hard to appreciate
the emotional resonance of the terms “Samaritan” and “Jew”.
Once we know a little of the background to their animosity we can appreciate
a little of the strength of feeling in today’s gospel reading. Luke
tells us how, “when the days drew near for Jesus to be taken up,
he set his face to go to Jerusalem.” Walking through potentially
hostile territory, the disciples must have felt nervous and wary, as they
followed their master on a journey that was full of foreboding from the
first footfall. Normally, Galilean Jews, making pilgrimage to Jerusalem,
would skirt around the edge of Samaritan territory on their way to the
Temple mount which Samaritans rejected as the sole place of valid worship.
But on this last journey to his death, Jesus made his way through Samaria.
A year ago
I made a ten day walking pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela. Some people
ask me about accommodation. Where did I stay and was there always a place
for me each night? Pilgrims are treated with respect and hospitality on
the Camino de Santiago. But on one occasion Jesus and his disciples did
not find a ready welcome. Tired and in need of somewhere to find shelter
and nourishment, and feeling edgy being in hostile territory, James and
John, Jesus’ closest henchmen, openly declare their fear and anger.
Previously they had been given power for exorcism, healing and to declare
the presence of the Kingdom of God. They had been told to expect free
provision, not needing to take their supplies during their mission. Previously,
James, Peter and John had been on the mount of Transfiguration with Jesus,
having privileged access to extraordinary experiences. So their response
to being rejected may have been consistent with their earlier experiences:
“Lord, do you want us to command fire to come down from heaven and
consume them?”
Hand to the
Plough
Jesus’ response was to rebuke them. Once more they had misunderstood
his way. Peter had been rebuked for challenging Jesus’ necessary
suffering. The disciples were rebuked from time to time for their lack
of faith or their slowness to grasp Jesus’ true mission. The misunderstanding
was this: calling down fire from heaven was significant in two ways in
the OT. In some cases it refers to judgement, as when Elijah called down
fire from heaven to destroy opponents or when Sodom was consumed in the
same way. In other cases fire came from heaven to consume a prepared sacrifice,
as with Moses, Elijah or Solomon, amongst others. James and John thought
that the fire of judgement was appropriate on this occasion because they
had been rejected. But animosity towards Samaritans was also mixed in
with their sense of righteous indignation. Their motives were not pure.
Jesus rebuked
them and they went on to another village. Luke’s next episode may
seem at first sight to have little connection with the previous episode
apart from being further scenes from the last journey to Jerusalem. Closer
inspection helps us to see that Luke is making a point about the reason
for Jesus setting his face to go to Jerusalem. Various individuals volunteer
to follow Jesus and he points out to them what it might cost them. “You
may not find a place to stay if you come along with me!” or “Coming
with me means re-ordering your priorities in life – my mission involves
leaving home with all its ties and obligations.” The point is this:
when the Son of Man is turned away from a village because he is on his
way to a place that is unacceptable to the people of that village, fire
from heaven is on its way. But the fire from heaven that will come is
not the fire that destroys sinners or Samaritans in judgement. This kind
of fire from heaven is that which consumes a sacrifice prepared and acceptable
to God.
Now it becomes
clearer: Jesus is on his way to Jerusalem where he will be sacrificed.
Whilst literal fire will not come from heaven, Jesus’ sacrifice
of himself on the cross will be the perfectly acceptable sacrifice to
fulfil and complete all sacrifice. Thus all difference between Samaritan
and Jew will be transcended by Jesus. Although Jesus must go to Jerusalem,
in order to fulfil the expectations of Jewish sacrifice, he is sacrificed
outside Jerusalem, not in the Temple rejected by Samaritans. After Pentecost
the good news of Jesus would be preached throughout Judea and Samaria
and people of both sides of the divide would come to believe and rejoice
in Jesus.
Conclusion
We have moved a long way from a society where ritual sacrifice has emotional
or cultural resonance. Fire from heaven may puzzle us. What has not changed
is that we experience estrangement and enmity. We experience rifts in
family relationships and breakdowns in friendships. We know of rivalries
in workplace, leisure pursuits or neighbourhoods. The challenge of Jesus
comes to us afresh: our feelings of fear or anger can never be justified
by wanting to call down judgement on our opponents, to have them apologise
or be clearly shown to be in the wrong. With our hand to the plough we
are called to leave behind the divisions and conflicts we experience and
look towards him who brings us together in things that matter far more
and makes us fit for the Kingdom of God, ready to receive Pentecostal
fire from heaven.
Copyright
© Rev Paul Smith
|
|
|
|
|